When I started my Grand Old Opry challenge four months ago, I had no idea what to expect. I didn't know if I could be successful, and if I was, I didn't know if it would be worth it. It was hard, and a lot of times I hated the restrictions, but I loved the results.
I found that this way of
losing weight made sense and worked for me in a way no other program
had. I recently stumbled upon the podcast that had inspired me to
start this challenge. I couldn't find it before, mostly because I
had thought it was done by This American Life. Then one day as I was
jogging and listening to Radiolab podcasts it started to play. I was
so excited to find it again, and found it spoke to me just as
strongly as I had remembered. The episode is called You v. You, and
I would definitely recommend listening to it. You can listen for
free on their website. It's only about 25 minutes long and like all
of their programs is both interesting and entertaining.
The first time I heard it I
was at a playground with my kids, listening to my IPod as we played.
I listened to the story of Zelda Gamson, and how she overcame her
smoking addiction. If you remember from my initial Grand Old Opry
post, this is the woman who pledged to give $5,000 to the KKK if she
ever smoked again. She never did. Then I listened to David Eagleman
explain the reasons why her ultimatum worked. It was like the
heavens opened and I saw the light. I realized that this is what it
would take for me to be successful at weight loss.
I have transcribed some of
what they say in the podcast. It's mostly David Eagleman, with some
interjections by Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich. I lumped it all
together to make it easier to read.
Things that are offered right now have so much more power than things that are offered in the future. You can think about this whole thing as a battle about time. We'll make all sorts of very poor economic decisions if something is offered right now vs. later.
When you look at the neuroimaging it becomes clear that there are different parts of the brain that are battling this out. And the now parts are always stronger.
Here is the key. What she is doing in the case of the cigarettes is she's saying, 'I know that I want to win this long term battle, but I'm having a heck of a time doing it. But if I can make the long term plan tied into a different immediate feeling of disgust, then all I have to do is have the disgust battle the desire.'
What she has done is she's turned this battle into a present tense battle on both sides. I want a cigarette now vs. I hate the KKK now. So it's a now vs. now thing. And I think that's the only way we ever win these long term battles is to give them some sort of emotional salience. Some reason why they matter to us right now otherwise it will never work.
This is so true. When I was
having my strongest urgings during the contest the logical
consequences of gaining weight and dealing with obesity problems
weren't enough to stop me from eating. Whatever the future
consequences may or may not be, they weren't strong enough matter,
because they weren't immediately threatening me. What mattered most
were the instant ramifications. When I was doing my challenge the
instant consequences of eating too much were that I would lose the
challenge, take responsibility for my actions, tell all my friends
and family that I had lost the challenge, and then humbly follow
through on the punishment. Even though those immediate consequences
weren't as drastic as Zelda's, they were enough.
I hear a lot about people
hitting rock bottom. I wonder if rock bottom is just the place where
the future becomes the now. The future ramifications of what might
happen are staring you in the face. You realize if you don't stop
your addiction right now there is no stopping the consequence. You
have gotten to the point where you are in a now vs. now situation.
I never hit rock bottom with
my weight gain. Not to the extent that I would do anything to stop
it. I knew that as a person I was more than my weight and I was
happy with who I was. I didn't consider weight that much of a
defining feature. Sure, I knew health-wise I would be better off
weighing less, and I did want it for myself, but it wasn't enough to
make the dramatic changes I needed to create a healthy lifestyle for
myself.
I truthfully wasn't even
that motivated to lose weight when I started this challenge, but I
forced myself into a position where I would have to care. To use
another reference from the Radiolab episode, I backed myself up
against a cliff and took on the fight. And I was successful.
The use of a self-imposed
ultimatum isn't something new. There's even a website,
stickK that
provides a way for you to set a goal with a monetary punishment if
you fail. But something about the way it was explained in this
podcast really resonated with me. And I like how I was able to
create a unique, kind of silly, way to challenge myself from it. It
worked well, and I plan to use the same method again, starting on
Monday, to continue losing weight.
Details to follow soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment